Mom left her substantial estate to one of her two sons, and disinherited the other son completely. The disinherited son challenged the will based on undue influence and lost, then filed an appeal.
The Court of Appeals goes through a thorough analysis of the undue influence elements in a challenge to a will. Those elements being: (1) susceptibility to undue influence; (2) opportunity; (3) disposition to unduly influence; (4) result which is the effect of undue influence.
Of interesting note is the fact that apparently there was a recording of her estate plan changes. While it is not clear whether these were video or audio taped, the court indicated the recording corroborated the attorneys' statements about her susceptibility.
The use of a recording, in my opinion, could cut both ways in supporting a will. For example, if a recording is made, it raises the question of "why" a recording was even made ("because we knew there was a concern about the individuals's capacity"). Also, the recording process may make the individual nervous and less at ease, which may translate to raising additional questions about the individual.
My recommendation has been to not do a recording, but the Court here may make me question that process. Of course, every case is different and has unique facts.
On the Iowa-Law Blog, I posted about another recent ruling involving an interference with an inheritance case.